The minimum wage was created during the Great Depression. We need to raise it during the Pandemic Recession

Originally published at the PA Capital-Star on March 7, 2021

Opponents of raising the minimum wage seem to have an inexhaustible supply ofĀ concerns whichĀ they repeat no matter how often weĀ present evidence that refutes them.Ā 

The latest one is the claim that we cannot raise the minimum wage during the COVID-19 recession. Raising the minimum wage during a recession, they say, will stall our recovery.Ā 

This might sound plausible for a second—orĀ until one remembers that the minimum wage was createdĀ during the Great DepressionĀ byĀ theĀ Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938Ā (FLSA). After aĀ slow recovery from the Great Depression, the economy wentĀ into reverseĀ in 1937 and theĀ beginningĀ of 1938.

The reason is clear.

In 1936, President Franklin RooseveltĀ startedĀ to listen to orthodox economists worried about the budget deficit. Taxes were raised,Ā government spendingĀ wasĀ cutĀ and the U.S. government had a balanced budget in 1937. The Federal ReserveĀ raised interestĀ ratsĀ as well, hurting the economy.Ā 

But the economy suffered. Unemployment, which was still high at 13.3 percent in May 1937, hadĀ jumped to 19% by June 1938. Manufacturing output fell by 37 percent from the 1937 peak.

 

In response, Roosevelt encouraged Congress to enact new spending programs andĀ renewed his fight forĀ the FLSA,Ā whichĀ CongressĀ passedĀ andĀ he signed on June 25, 1938.Ā The FLSAĀ required employers to pay time and a half after 44 hoursĀ of work,Ā banned child labor, and created a minimum wage of 25 centsĀ perĀ hour.

Just like today,Ā business peopleĀ complained.Ā Roosevelt respondedĀ theĀ wayĀ we should respond todayĀ (with numbers adjusted for inflation): ā€œDo not let any calamity-howling executive with an income of $1,000 a day, … tell you … that a wage of $11 a week is going to have a disastrous effect on all American industry.ā€

While the minimum wage did not apply to all workers, 25 centsĀ anĀ hour wasĀ a significantĀ wageĀ in 1938. Indeed, it was 42 percent of the average wage of Pennsylvania workers that year.

And increases in the minimum wage in subsequent years drove it up to 46 percent of the average Pennsylvania wage in 1940 and 52% in 1950. AfterĀ dropping again, the minimum wage again rose to 52 percent of the average wage in 1968.Ā 

However, in the years since 1968 the minimum wageĀ was not raisedĀ in step with inflation andĀ is nowĀ at an all-time low of 25.1 percentĀ of the averageĀ Pennsylvania wage.

(Pennsylvania Budget & Policy Center)Ā 

AĀ higherĀ minimum wage,Ā together withĀ governmentĀ deficitĀ spending,Ā did finally leadĀ the country out of the Great Depression.

And the reason the minimum wage helped rather than hurt the economy in 1938 is the same reason it will help today: When wages go up, workers have the means to spend more in the local economy.Ā It is consumer spending that drives our economy forward—andĀ it is also whatĀ gives businesses a reason to invest more in productive capacity.Ā 

Far from hurting the economy,Ā aĀ $12 minimum wage on July 1, 2021,Ā would add $4 billion to consumer spending in our stateĀ andĀ a $15 minimum wage in 2027 would add $6 billion.

Ā A $15Ā minimum wageĀ isĀ notĀ out of line with past practice. A $15Ā minimum wage today would only beĀ aboutĀ 50% of the average wage in Pennsylvania and would be a bit lower by the time it is reached in 2027. That is below what the minimum wage / average wage ratio was at its height in 1950 and 1968.And 1968 was a year with historically low unemployment.

A wage at that level would do what the minimum wage was meant to doĀ when the FLSA was enacted—quicken the pace ofĀ economicĀ recovery andĀ ensure that all working people—including theĀ manyĀ adult, full-time workersĀ with childrenĀ who work for theĀ currentĀ minimum wage —have a decent standard of living.Ā Pennsylvanians deserve that in 2021,Ā just as they did in 1938.

A note on the data: It is generally preferable to compare the minimum wage rate to the median wage,Ā not the average wageĀ an increase inĀ inequalityĀ could, by itself, lead to an increase in theĀ theĀ averageĀ wage.Ā 

AveragesĀ are farĀ moreĀ affected by extremesĀ of high and low,Ā but the median,Ā orĀ midpoint,Ā in a series is not.Ā 

But we do notĀ have historical data for median wages in Pennsylvania prior to 1968, thus the tableĀ aboveĀ presents the ratio of the minimum wage to the average wage.

The following table, however, adds a second line with the ratio of minimum wage to the median wage in Pennsylvania.Ā The two data series track closely, giving us more confidence in the minimum to average wage data.Ā 

Marc Stier is the director of the Pennsylvania Budget & Policy Center, a progressive think-tank in Harrisburg. His work appears frequently on the Capital-Star’s Commentary Page.Ā 

Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply