STATEMENT: The Shortfall in Rental Assistance Is a Policy Choice

According to the Philadelphia Inquirer, 45,000 households have applied for rental assistance as of Friday, August 6. But the City of Philadelphia only has enough funding to provide help for half of them, and more applications are coming in every day. No one should be surprised by this devastating result. In June, a PA Budget and Policy Center policy paper showed that the General Assembly had distributed federal funds for rental assistance in a way that shorted urban counties, which are also counties that have a higher share of Black families. The Pennsylvania General Assembly distributed emergency rental funds based on county population. At first glance, that may seem reasonable. But there is enormous variation in both the share of households that rent their homes in each county and in the cost of housing in each county. So, a population-based formula for distributing emergency rental funds short-changes our state’s urban… Continue reading

Here’s how we stop the coming eviction and foreclosure tsunami

Originally published at the PA Capital-Star on August 28, 2020 Pennsylvania is now facing a housing catastrophe as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. On Monday, Gov. Tom Wolf told legislative leaders that he does not have the authority to extend the moratorium on evictions and foreclosure beyond the August 31 deadline. This decision sets the state on the path of a humanitarian and economic disaster. As the governor’s letter to state lawmakers points out, the General Assembly can, and must, take action to prevent that disaster from coming to pass. The COVID-19 pandemic reduced the country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by 9.5 percent in the second quarter of the year, or 32.9 percent, on an annual basis. The damage in Pennsylvania has been equally severe. The pandemic has left many Pennsylvanians short of the funds needed to pay their rent. But they have not been subject to eviction because… Continue reading

Inclusionary housing update

Not long ago, we held an interesting debate here about Inclusionary Housing with some of us (including me) seeking a bill that directs most of the money to those with the lowest incomes in the city and others (including Ray) worried about the difficulties for those in the middle of the income scale. The wonderful world of Philadelphia politics has brought us a compromise to please everyone. The Philadelphia Coalition for Housing Justice has reached an agreement with Councilman Clarke on a an IH bill. We were concerned that Clarke’s bill would mainly serve middle class Philadelphians, rather than providing affordable housing for those who needed it most. But now Clarke has amended his bill require that half of the on-site units would sold or rented to families earning between 0 – 80% of AMI Clarke agreed that 50% of all on-site units should serve people between 0 – 80%… Continue reading

Why you should care about the inclusionary housing hearing on Wednesday

This Wednesday, November 28th at 11:00am in Room 400 of City Hall, a critical hearing on Darrell Clarke’s deeply flawed Inclusionary Housing bill will be held. The Philadelphia Campaign for Housing Justice urges all progressives and community activists to attend the hearing To learn more about how Clarke’s bill differs from the bill drafted by the Philadelphia Campaign for Housing Justice (PCHJ), and why the PCHJ bill is superior to Clarke’s please visit our website. http://www.philahousingjustice.org. For a little broader view of the importance of Inclusionary Housing in the context of the growing problem of gentrification in Philadelphia, read on. (Note: I am a member of the Philadelphia Campaign for Housing Justice and the webmaster of our site. However, what follows is my own view and is probably not shared by every member of the PCHJ. In addition, while both SEIU Local 32BJ and SEIU Local 1199p have played a… Continue reading

The case for inclusionary housing

Philadelphia Daily News (PA), June 19, 2006 RIDE UP AND down the streets of Philadelphia these days, and almost everywhere you’ll see housing construction and rehabilitation. Ā This is wonderful. It brings new people into the city. Creates jobs. And helps revive neighborhoods that for too long have been in decline. New development also has tremendous potential for ameliorating social problems. Poverty, to start with, means low wages and frequent unemployment. But that’s perhaps not the worst of it. Low wages and unemployment are made much worse when you live in a neighborhood that is declining commercially, that lacks city services, parks and recreation facilities; that suffers from housing deterioration; and that is constantly threatened by crime. Children there are cut off from mainstream economic and political life and have little hope for the future. New development offers a chance to create a city of economically, ethnically and racially diverse neighborhoods,… Continue reading

Coming attractions: inclusionary housing

One of the most interesting ideas for neighborhood development is coming to Philadelphia—Inclusionary Housing. It is being brought to you by a new alliance, the Campaign for Housing Justice. You can be there for the premiere if you come to a Rally for Housing Justice Tomorrow, Thursday, June 14, 9:30 at the Clothespin (15th and Market). Inclusionary Housing is a policy that requires residential developers who are getting a tax break, zoning variance or other benefit from the government to provide affordable housing in return. Developers of large projects are required to set aside a certain percentage of their units for affordable housing. Developers of small projects are required to contribute to a fund for affordable housing, such as our Housing Trust Fund. (The policy is called inclusionary zoning in other places, but for reasons we don’t need to go into here, we have adopted another name in Philadelphia.) The… Continue reading

Housing trust fund testimony 2: the power of Council

This is the second part of my testimony on the Housing Trust Fund. During the course of the hearings Councilwoman Blackwell complained about how district Council members did not have enough control over housing project in their district. This issue will definitely come up again, as Councilwoman Blackwell has proposed an ordinance that would require the Trust Fund advisory board to report to Council as well as the Administration. This might not be a bad idea as the advisory committee does make recommendations about how Housing Trust Fund money should be distributed between, for example, new construction and the rehabilitation of existing housing units. As Councilwoman Tasco pointed out during I interchange I had with her in the hearing, this does seem to be a role for Council. However whether Council should approve each project is, I think, a different matter as I explain below. Continue reading

Housing trust fund testimony 1: don't divide the fund

This is the first part of my testimony before City Council on the Housing Trust Fund. My argument here is against Councilwoman Blackwell’s proposed ordinance to divide the Housing Trust Fund money equally among the ten council districts. While this idea died in committee, it may come back again. So I thought it might be a good idea to post it. Chairwoman Blackwell, Members of the Committee Thank you for giving me an opportunity to testify about this ordinance. Continue reading

Hearing on the housing trust fund

Council Hearings are being held today (Wednesday, June 7)) and tomorrow (Thursday, June 8 ) on three ordinances related to the Housing Trust Fund, which remains in danger. Here is some information on the hearing, the ordinances that will be considered, and my view of those ordinances. I urge you to contact your council members and all the at-large council members to express your views on these bill. You can find phone, fax and email contact information for Council members on my website. Or you can use the Hallwatch Faxbank Service to send a fax to all council members who represent you. Continue reading

The "debate" over housing reorganization

Ā The ā€œdebateā€ over the reorganization of the city’s three agencies that deal with housing is showing Philadelphia politics at its worst. A struggle over housing agencies is taking place right now. Yet we know very little about the details of the plan the Mayor will propose. And thus there has been no serious discussion of the benefits and costs of that plan or alternatives to it. Councilwoman Blackwell has been fighting the plan but not by offering her own perspective on how our housing agencies should be organized. Instead she has been using the budget to hold the Housing Trust Fund and other housing dollars hostage. Continue reading