Category: Abortion

No comments

The Cost of Banning Abortion in Pennsylvania

  By Abortion, Feminism

By Claire Kovach with Marc Stier Drawing on a few decades of research, this paper shows that banning abortion would severely harm women in the state, especially women of color and women with low incomes. The paper summarizes research showing that the inability to secure an abortion harms women’s physical and mental health, makes it harder for them to secure an education, reduces their prospects for employment and good wages, and is likely to leave them facing hardship and poverty. The paper concludes that the combined direct and indirect effects of a total ban on abortion in Pennsylvania would likely reduce wages in the state by $10 billion a year. <a href=”http:marcstier.com/blog2/wp-content/uplaods/22/09/CostOfAbortionBan-2.pdf” rel=”noopener” target=”_blank”>Click here to read full screen or print.</a> &nbsp; Continue reading

No comments

Statement on Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade Decision

  By Abortion, Feminism, PA Budget and Policy Center, Pennsylvania, Statements

  FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: June 24, 2022 Contacts: Kirstin Snow, snow@pennbpc.org   Statement on Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade Decision By Marc Stier, Director, PA Budget & Policy Center The right to abortion is paramount to the right to personal autonomy. There is no choice as life-defining as that of whether to bring a child into the world. Without the right to have an abortion and access to the procedure, pregnant people are denied the autonomy and freedom to make decisions about their own health, well-being, and the course of their lives. Banning abortion would limit the rights of half the population: women, transgender, nonbinary, and gender non-conforming people, undermining their ability to be full participants in our political, social, economic, and cultural life. And the radical opinion signed by six justices of the Supreme Court not only undermines the right to abortion but is a threat to other kinds of… Continue reading

No comments

STATEMENT: The Right to Have an Abortion Is Critical to the Well-Being of PA and Pennsylvanians

  By Abortion, PA Budget and Policy Center, Statements

Among the rights that are critical to all human beings is the right to personal autonomy—that is the right to make fundamental choices about our bodies and the course of our lives. There is no choice as life-defining as that of whether to bring a new child into the world. Without the right to have an abortion and access to the procedure, pregnant people are denied the autonomy and freedom to make decisions about their own health, well-being, and the course of their lives. Banning abortion would limit the rights of half the population: women, transgender, nonbinary, and gender non-conforming people, undermining their ability to be full participants in our political, social, economic, and cultural life. If those who oppose the right to abortion were seriously concerned about the well-being of fetuses and their potential to become children, they would focus their attention on ensuring that all families, including those… Continue reading

No comments

The modern transformation of asceticism and the origins of the culture war

  By Abortion, Feminism, Love and Sex, Philosophy

Many of us have responded to the new threat to Roe v. Wade by reminding people that the aim of the right is not to protect unborn children but to control women. However, for some people, accustomed to living in a world in which they expect women to be treated as full participants in our political, social, and cultural lives,  that notion is odd. They don’t understand that control of women means and why it is so important in right wing thought. There are a number of answers but one is that policing abortion is part of the right-wing project of policing sexuality as a whole. And policing sexuality, especially female sexuality, is, for the  right wing mind, critical to ensuring that men carry out their responsibilities to have and take care of children and hold down a job. As is common in political and social life these claims rest… Continue reading

No comments

Alito’s Jurisprudence Aims to Bring Back the Bad Old Days

  By Abortion, Feminism, Jurisprudence, Philosophy

Justice Samuel Alito’s draft opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization is an exemplary piece of judicial writing. His argument is clear, powerful and straightforward. With one small exception, he doesn’t shrink from explaining both how he reads the constitution and the consequences of reading it that way. Again with that one exception, he doesn’t sugarcoat his views to avoid political controversy. And that exception is so glaring that we can easily see through his reticence. Indeed, I think he wants us to see through it because Alioto is not trying to avoid controversy. He believes that a substantial body of Constitutional law was wrongly decided, has a strong argument to defend his conclusion, and wants to see his views triumph not just in this case but in others. His views are also deeply wrong and profoundly dangerous. They are based on a theory of constitutional interpretation that we… Continue reading